The strongest drivers for EU Internet regulation are concepts of harm prevention. So this translates to child protectionism, medical authority in terms of pandemic emergency and fraud prevention in banking and elections. None of these protection issue bases are bad or intended for harm. However, there have been abuses of power using these issue bases to conceal executed agendas.
Rays of global commerce-led government regulations have proven outcomes that censor publican speech and financially sanction them for airing grievance against governments using online expressions of digital identity to cut off their rightful banking credentials.
Examples of global corporate infilled (WEF) UN/EU SDG Policy this week:
California Design Code Censors Speech, 'Masquerades' As Privacy Law, Tech Group Argues
20 Years of Facebook, but Trust in Social Media Remains Rock Bottom
Amazon Responds To Republican Sens. On Book Ban, Says Won’t Sell Books That Frame LGBTQ+ Identities As Mental Illness (The US government asked them to censor/ban books and they did so.)
Jim Jordan and 44 Other Members of Congress Submit Brief to the Supreme Court in Major Big Tech Censorship Case
NCAC Condemns Biden Administration’s Attempts to Coerce Amazon Into Censorship
Treasury Department’s Janet Yellen Dodges Questions on Financial Surveillance of “MAGA,” “Trump”
As WHO Pandemic Treaty Nears Completion, Critics Raise Red Flags for US Freedoms - The legally binding agreement is structured in such a way that it sidesteps U.S. Senate approval for the United States to join, which is required for treaties.
The UN and the UN Foundations have become an international wellspring or honeypot to fund humanitarian and high tech NGOs. These operations will have increasing impact to touch the third rail. Again, that’s not necessarily always bad.
The problem comes with extra-national or global governance laundering. These are domestic regulations drawn up by rival governments, corporations and private philanthropists, who also finance public policy that undermines sovereign civil governance agreements.
The governing bodies do not conform to a vote of the tax paying public.
Summarily, the corporations and governments drawing up these regulations are free of consumer blowback by the governed publics. That’s how you might get a nonprofit enterprise to sponsor public policy drawn up by China and Mexican narco-cartels so they benefit by forcing an international migratory crisis in the Americas.
[T]he United Nations Foundation's tax filings reveal that it has itself received tens of millions of dollars from major left-wing pass-through organizations.
For example, in recent years, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has contributed more than $55 million, the Bezos Earth Fund has contributed nearly $6 million, and the Tides Foundation contributed nearly $4 million. Corporations such as Johnson & Johnson and Facebook, and government entities from the U.K., Canada, Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands have contributed tens of millions of dollars more.
According to United Nations Foundation tax filings reviewed by Fox News Digital, the group wired a staggering $5.4 million to 12 state governments between 2020 and 2022, the most recent year with data available, with grants often being vaguely earmarked for "UN strengthening." Further, information requests shared with Fox News Digital indicate another state, Michigan, received $451,000 from the group circuitously routed through the University of Michigan.
"What we see is that wealthy donors are providing layers of ‘staff’ to do what is supposedly government work, led by a U.N. ‘strategic partner’ no less boasting that these millions to staff government offices in the United States is for ‘UN Strengthening,’" D.C. lawyer Chris Horner, who filed the information requests on behalf of watchdog groups Government Accountability & Oversight (GAO) and Power The Future, told Fox News Digital.
This week we deal with Russia. I didn’t ask for this. It wasn’t my idea. I wasn’t invited to the calendar meeting where they decided to punch up using news coordination. Given the intractable foreign policy graft/appropriations attracting the orbit of NGO vulture lobbies at the US Senate, I can say they had it coming. [Leave your complaints in the comments section.]
It was the US Senate who decided to hinge US domestic protectionism on NATO global protectionism. The bill writers planted a ton of poison pills in the bill (because we cannot afford it); which led to a big DOA theater event for Ukraine appropriations in war. The preciptations of false claims that US citizens are somehow traitors to Ukraine by not funding their war is patently absurd, but that’s what CNN looks like right now.
I simply don’t know what’s worse, listening to FOIA bros talk research discovery on Russiagate [18:18] or this molar grinding two hour circle-sit with Vladamir Putin.
“Russian President Vladimir Putin had some typically grandiloquent things to say about artificial intelligence and the future of the human race in his interview last night with Tucker Carlson.
And they were even pro-regulation! Says Putin: "When there arises an understanding that the boundless and uncontrolled development of artificial intelligence or genetics or some other modern trends, cannot be stopped, that these researches will still exist just as it was impossible to hide gunpowder from humanity... when humanity feels a threat to itself, to humanity as a whole, then, it seems to me, there will come a period to negotiate at the inter-state level on how we will regulate this.”
He also nodded to Elon Musk’s Neuralink project, saying “there’s no stopping” Musk and that “he will do as he sees fit,” and referenced the (supposed) ability of scientists to create a “superman” through genetic manipulation.” c/o Derek Robertson @Politico
There was also the counter spin and politics of journalism outside the interview contents. The experience has been akin to being downwind of manure turfing. There were contradicting reports that Ukraine placed Carlson on a kill-list for interviewing Putin. No, we still do not know whether Gonzalo Lira’s body has been returned for funerary to the family from Ukraine. No, we don’t know if Tucker Carlson is done with Russia this week or if he is back in the US, despite unmerited threats of impediment by EU government petition.
SEE ALSO: EU spokesperson claims 'no discussions' to ban Tucker
Nevertheless, we come home issues impacting privacy in real-time, NSA full spectrum surveillance vs. export-weapons grade tech, FTC/FCC vs. AI fakery, robocalls & identity fraud, and Google’s “get real” report on commercial surveillance lands and AI emergency killswitch bill moves forward in California.
Share this post