Is The Singularity A Race to Shunt Meaningful Human Life?

Generative AI makers quest for superintelligence supremacy won't rest until the last human life is made completely meaningless.

As I write this, I am eating a unique custard tart designed in Portugal. The only reason why I chose this tart is other people brought it to my local market and presented it to me as a good thing to eat. If I decided this was not good for me I would not have brought it home, much less ate it. Thankfully, this was a good experience from a food innovation.

Artificial Intelligence, in its current generative form, is being treated much more like a free range bomb these days than a beneficial technology. No one really says the “superintelligence” or the Singularity, as coined by Ray Kurzweil, is good for humanity. So why are these makers expediting the end of an otherwise meaningful human experience?

Oh. Innovation.

If you read some of their writings, human life is generalized as morbidly meaningless, meandering, purposeless and directionless without their technical assistance. That is why organized systems. That is why excessive technocratic governance. That is also how Spanish, Dutch and English slave trappers viewed village populations before they extracted entire communities off of the African continent to work as destitute slaves in the Americas.

“These people’s lives are less functional, low tech, ignorant. Whatever we do to them will be an improvement on their lives! They’ll have free food, free housing, free clothes while they do whatever we want.” - DEHUMANIZING LOGISTICS COUNSEL OF THE 1400s.

It also answers why they may be trying to put functional able people in a class of debilitated persons. There are less able people. Would you put it past pharmacological technologists to try to knee-cap a more broadly mundane abled group of persons to manufacture a dependent lowest common denominator? Technologists derive dominance from human dependency.

If you can use your brain faculties, God’s original wetware, you don’t need a Brain Computing Interface or BCI. There is some sidebar discourse that the nature of COVID-19 was to corrupt human neurology cell development. So that broad populations would need continuous pharmacological technology, gene therapy dependencies and advanced assistance later in life. Big Pharma is not beyond creating a problem, to engineer a controlled solution to capture otherwise independent populations.

They bill their intentions as only for the greater good, for human progress. Did anyone in the press or media ask how they were qualified to evaluate the meaning of all human living standard and “elevate” human progress? They were elected by no one. Yet they want to determining the entire future of humanity based on a compulsive need to create technology that eradicates every independent impulse. Widespread accounts on the current trajectory of generative AI, if deployed over term of five years, will eliminate labor in our society and cause occupation to cease. That would greatly deprecate the meaning of conventional human living.

STALKING BUTLER TECHNOLOGIES INC. , THEY INSIST!

You are no one unless you are being served by a Stalking Butler Technology. Social media is a stalking butler technology, as it licenses every iota of surveillance data for the benefit of platforms. Your iPhone or Android device makes it possible for people to drop in on your conversations, invited or not, because they are lonely or curious or evil or testing their hacking technique. Whatev'e.

In their DEI-washing of tech corporate culture, shirt clutching in sympathy circles with [INSERT MINORITIES FOR DEMONSTRATION HERE] reciting the hymn, “I am enough,” they go back to work in their cubicles to take down an imperfect but otherwise productive society. They surround themselves with people who indict all Western human culture for trying to make a living. Do they never find a way to self-indict? Is that why all the lost corporate time is spent on the Marxist derived self-flagellation?

ALL TECH IS HUMAN (Ahh. No, it isn’t.)

Has anyone asked Ray Kurzweil if he thinks his own human life is devoid of meaning? The Singularity poses tilted on a the elevation of a certain genocide of mankind. The people he surrounds himself blithely never call it out because they have been greenwashed into grounds for depopulation of the earth because ‘too many humans’. Who decides there are too many humans? Humans obsessed with killing off off the prospects and lives of other humans.

For what purpose? To advance their own piracy of private property. If you wipe out whole functional populations, could you live lawlessly on great tracts of land, in homes you never built or paid for, squatting wherever you want and live like swollen ticks until death? You might.

Well, not quite yet. There’s going to be an epoch where we strip out all the meaning of human life to make way for AI to perform tasks that currently veil a depraved indifference to butchery, slavery and crimes against humanity, first. If you don’t care about the functional fate of your fellow man, you cannot sell anyone on your stewardship of the wild or of nature. If you treat your own species like they are a pestilence, there is cause to mistrust you with the plants and the animals.

So why delegate so much to these egoistic developer technologists, on a fools errand to make a poison they’ll be forced to take themselves eventually?

It’s time to ask how innovative is a technology if its direction is pointed at economic genocide, dissipation of human society, cultural atrophy for the sake of fostering the Singularity? Do we really hate ourselves that much as a species?

What is the point of their tech if no one is around?