IDENTITY QUORUM: A means to an end in centralized over-governing.
Nikki Hailey, Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum have one thing in common: an agenda to appropriate real identity to a global online environment where they make all the rules.
When I look at government initiative, I look at whose lives are really being improved. Lately, when the US government spends tax dollars money, it spends to suspend more of your personal liberty, take more power of personal license away from the citizen and presume you are a child and that they know best. It’s the action of a regressivist better known as ‘infantilisation’.
You can’t really do that so easily with a big field of adults. Children will go along for awhile. Adults know their rights, find resources to check bullies and overreach. They know how to use a firearm – just in case. They sue the government when they are out of line. They don’t comply when they get nothing from the exchange of resources. When a morally inferior character beats them at first, they get mature about it and go get more allies. They return fire in line of self-defense from unwarranted aggression from without. No one can really blame them, but some do try.
Infantilisation is a civil libertarian marker of a certain decline. From infantilisation comes “relief of responsibility” or the State process to decompensate a legal adult. That would be the State vaunting an involuntary conservatorship or legal guardianship, akin to power of attorney, over personal property, what you watch, who you associate with and speak to, where you live, your basic health decisions and how far you can stray from your residence without a “security” intervention.
It’s a shakedown where they take your stuff.
Lastly, it would be things you can say out loud. For these reasons, advocates for personal rights of the disabled fight over all sorts of things you never worry about, like, the right to maintain custody and raise children, for instance. However in the push for the fourth industrial revolution, the rules seem to be made by an inaccessible global, therefore unaccountable and faceless third-party.
EXPLAINED: The Trouble With Washington’s ‘Rules-Based Order’ Gambit
What kind of universe are we living in when intelligent, able adults are conveyed as incompetent so over-governing autocrats can take their stuff? Many many books throughout history have been written about this. The common thread among them all is the ability to commandeer the societal terms and conditions on a persons identity.
THE MANUFACTURED DEMAND FOR COMPUTING PARTS
Over the years, I have written about the ways and means governments and corporations seek to corral, steal and over-govern the matter of online identity. NSTIC was Obama’s bid to instill a multifactor authentication system for Real Names ID based on “trust” and “security”. Trust is relative when you don’t have it to give.
For now, the government has a zero trust cybersecurity initiative that does not rely on your participation or your consent to move in on a network user. Those can be the terms of force. Whether or not they have a warrant or apparent need to do so is another thing entirely. The point is control, of course.
As the U.S. intelligence infrastructure expands exponentially and ominously, Obama has assured Americans that they need not be concerned over the resulting massive intrusion into their lives.Insisting that he is not saying “trust me; we’re doing the right thing; we know who the bad guys are, ” he points out that the surveillance programs have “congressional oversight and judicial oversight.” However, Obama concedes that if the American people neither trust the chief executive, nor Congress nor the judiciary “to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution, due process and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here.”
- Yuram Abdullah Weiler
Mr. Weiler was correct in his assessment of passive aggression by the former President Obama. Obama’s Intel agencies mistook American dissent for an increase in demand for additional mass surveillance programs and piled on. Under Obama the intrusions worsened and many, many people were shocked and even coerced into silence.
So much was mistaken and misreported towards public consent on these programs. The point was for the government to manage the optics, to make it appear to the global community they had the consent of the larger public. When in fact the dissents both written and public were not just ignored but chased with State aggression as a follow up act.
The other side of this, of course, were the people who benefited from mass loss of privacy, namely: government tech investors, the social media companies, the Big Four Technology companies aka Big Tech, and the advertising surveillance scaffolding and APEC financial exchanges that made them all histrionically rich. Seattle & Palo Alto tech socialists and their high-handed legal data processors and administrators inserted themselves into every legal process to obstruct user dissent down to small claims court. None of this could have happened without their ability to control the public narrative, the legal system and the opposition online.
At one point Nicole Ozer, at ACLU of Northern California gave a full throated objection to a US citizen’s self-ownership and the ownership of their data, without providing a single merited rebuttal other than, “It can be sold!!”. As she was speaking, social media companies were just becoming ‘media companies’ selling consumer data, with or without consumer consent to the government and to brokerages in Hong Kong, Bangalore, Moldova, Moscow, to the UAE and on and on and on. Universities like Stanford, MIT and University of Washington insisted this was “the new normal”.
They just laid down flat on your behalf, derelict to civil libertarian public interest because they all benefited hand over fist. None of this could happen without automation and artificial intelligence to cull the masses.
THE TECHNOCRATIC TRIAD OF ONLINE CONTROL
Other diverse vectors to corral is the algorithmic distillation of online ID using biometrics, GPS location and personal communications surveillance. This is the technocratic triad of control online. To mandate the online ID environment has been a long term goal of US neoconservative and neoliberal autocrats who build the networks & software and supply the contracts to the US government.
Modern computing governance is obsessed with manufacturing biomedical demand for computing. It is not so much that people should more strongly resemble a robot, even if transhumanist religion is emerging. Rather, it is the manufacturing of a robotics parts market through administrative rules & mandates on US terms of “health”. When the lines cross what you can say about public medicine and your personal rights, our society has run into issues of modern censorship.
RULES BASED HARM: Robert Malone testifies on lack of informed consent, vax injuries in front of Congress
A healthy human being does not need robotics parts inside their body telling them what to do via satellite. However, if the government can mandate a part for a car that sweeps the vehicle for all unencrypted wireless signal information, you will either put your phone in a blackout bag when you travel or you will submit to daily communications scrape surveillance of the cabin inside your car. Upon the downward slippery slide into tech conservatorship and your body and mind become the car cabin.
ICYMI:House Republicans Help Dems Preserve ‘Kill Switch’ Mandate That Could Shut Down Your Car
Far down the disintegrating line of technocratic infantilisation, a persons’ involuntary organ systems may become the target of internalized surveillance. If it has gone that far, the State may also mandate a ‘kill switch’ to shut a person down or kill them off entirely for some arbitrary uncleanness decided in a remote public health office.
READ: WHO forecasts new pandemic, deadlier than Covid-19, is coming up
THE LESSON IS… OWN YOUR IDENTITY
They love to use identity articles: passports, visas, drivers licenses and banking requirements to hold a citizens possessions, money and mobility hostage. In every culture where computation power has emerged it has been used to cull the masses targeting an identified person’s psychometry. That is how a vital free person in any region of the world came to slavery and squalor via systematization.
Please remember to self advocate by answering the US Copyright Office’s Query for Stakeholder input open until November 29th, 2023.
On a lighter note, you can still sing your carols this Holiday Season and do so in part due to the good work of people escaping repression given a certain thanks to the US people.
Let’s remember the freedom to give thanks for what we are actually grateful for as opposed to what the State insists we be grateful for under threat of repression.